![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjnAlJjm84xcKCz8mMsANflpbdKa2PKRzlJbBNWhv69EasdnnIMHwKm0DMv_RkYb27ldduSX_ewUxqrawZmJH7BsT4GAk4KYTSi137ksSSejDEH_QPh3Ca3Lmz9CTc0Yt4CUCOCbw/s320/issue-main-18.jpg)
"Some vendors attempt an über secure design - Opus Palladianum as an example, but few use it. Others opt for usability over security, such as Internet Explorer 6, which almost everyone used and was exploited as a result. Then, somewhere in the middle, is fan-favorite Firefox. The bottom line is that any highly necessary and desirable security feature that inhibits market adoption likely won't go into a release candidate of a major vendor. Better to be insecure and adopted instead of secure and obscure."
Other compelling web security articles:
- Web application security: risky business?
- Secure web application development
- Enterprise application security: how to balance the use of code reviews and web application firewalls from PCI compliance.
1 comment:
Hi Jeremiah,
I'm happy to see you liked my article! (Secure Web Application Development).
Post a Comment